Are you sure? Im postive.
Seels as though Flandis has tested positve in the second round. I guess at some point we are going to have to believe the tests, right? Think about this. In the US, the land of lawyers, rarely is an athlete guilty of doping. Even if they test positive. Take baseball. They didnt even really allow testing. Is that because there was no need because there was no doping? Or is that because they wanted to protect the likes Rafael Palmeiro who wants to keep up with the youngsters and he dont wanna go out like that. Or he didnt wanna go out like THAT. In europe, the police raid cycling team hotels like the DEA and put all the riders in the pattywagon in the middle of the night and shove them in jail. At the same moment, they raid their houses and get all the drugs out of there. Then everyone knows just how guilty they are.Now Flandis is going to drag this on. If he is guilty, I say he should come out of the closet and lay it all out. Even about those he has raced with in the past. Not like his team should even be around anymore. Good job Pereiro on winning the tour. He must have learned well on Phonak.
posted by craigerific @ 8:06 AM
a page about my life, food, wine, bikes, incorrect grammar, likes and dislikes, and worldwide views other than my own.
4 Comments:
crow here,
Flandis pro career trajectory...moth like. Fly towards the light (drugs,) get zapped, go down in flames. In other words Flandis is currently circling the bowl with some other terds like TH and JU.
but.. uh.. didn't Rafeal Palmero test positive? And thus get banned? So doesn't that kind of disprove your point?
what up, no posts? maybe flandis tested positive for testoreone because his balls are so big.
No the point was that palmeiro didnt want to test positive, hence the term didnt want to go like THAT. Makes you wonder what happened to Ryan Franklin. He's a doper too.
Post a Comment
<< Home